Press enter to see results or esc to cancel.

The Community Discussion Should Begin Soon about Summit County Buying the Land Between Jeremy Ranch School and the Burt Brothers

As many people have heard, Summit County purchased an option to buy about 30 acres of land between Jeremy Ranch Elementary School and Burt Brothers.  In the county’s press release, they stated they may be looking at putting affordable housing or some sort of transit solution on the land. Over the past few days, this has caused some concern on social media sites like NextDoor and with a few people I have spoken with.

The concerns seem to stem from both the affordable housing component and the transportation component. People aren’t so sure they really want affordable housing next to a school or that they want it at all. As for transportation, people seem concerned that a park and ride will bring more people into the Jeremy Ranch area, and that will make the Jeremy Ranch interchange as big of a mess as Kimball Junction.

I had the chance to sit down with Summit County Manager, Tom Fisher, and Summit County Council Chairperson, Roger Armstrong, on Friday to talk about the topic. The first question I asked of Mr Fisher was why they thought this was the right spot for a transportation hub and affordable housing. Mr Fisher quickly corrected me and told me that no decisions had been made on what may be going there. He said that they wanted to receive community input before making any decisions. Mr Armstrong said that there are a limited number of parcels available for purchase and that when this became available it made sense to at least consider it for use by the county and its residents. Mr Fisher and Mr Armstrong both spoke of two of the top priorities, per citizen surveys, and the need to make things better. Those priorities being transportation and affordable housing. That is why they listed them as potential solutions in the county press release about the purchase of the land.

That’s the good news. It appears the county views this as a potentially valuable piece of land that can be used in a numbers of ways. While the statements about affordable housing and transportation in the press release provide an idea of where some in the county would like to go with the land, it really sounds like it is open for debate. Other options (in my view… and not necessarily Summit County’s) could include a recreation center (pool, park, field house). It may prove a better place for a new Park City school than the Ecker Hill campus does. Perhaps we want an extension of the business park where the Burt Brothers is, since it seems to be so busy these days. Perhaps we want some restaurants and small retail like a pharmacy. Perhaps we want a park and ride. Perhaps we want to preserve it as open space.

Or perhaps we would prefer to leave the land as it is zoned. That would mean someone could build just one house on the entire 30 acres.

It really is up to us as citizens.

After my meeting with the county, I don’t believe they plan anything “nefarious” with the land. They are just keeping their options open. However, it is up to us as citizens to guide those options.  The county’s goals may or may not align with yours. That alignment will likely guide your attitude toward whether the county should ultimately buy this land.

Keep in mind that the county only purchased an “option” to buy the land. They have until January 2017 to decide whether they actually want to proceed with it. Your feedback to the county in the next few months will likely drive the direction they will take.

I firmly believe the county learned from the school bond failure. They know they will have to make a concrete proposal to the public before they spend almost $4 million on this land. They will have to tell us who any proposed partners are in the deal (i.e. Mountain Lands Community Housing Trust, the school district, UDOT, Park City, Vail, etc.). They’ll need to convince us that traffic on a two-lane Rasmussen Road can handle whatever they propose (or that it can be expanded). They’ll need to convince Jeremy Ranch residents that whatever they do will positively impact home values (or at least not reduce them). They’ll need to convince Jeremy Ranch Elementary School Parents that it introduces no safety issues with their children. They’ll need to convince all residents, if they decide to build a transit station, that people will actually stop on their way in from Salt Lake and ride a bus into town. They’ll need to convince Pinebrook and Jeremy Ranch residents that the proposed interchange improvements have accounted for the added traffic a successful project would bring.

Simply stated, they’ll need to convince a majority of people that, all in, this is the right thing for our community.

We have smart people with good ideas in our government. If they put themselves in the average-residents shoes, they’ll likely come up with good solutions. However, they only have about 10 months to gather input, make plans, gather input, find partners, gather input, go through our planning commission, gather input, hold meetings with the county council, gather input and make an ultimate decision on whether to buy this land. Borrowing the words from a Jerry Reed song, “they have a long way to go and a short time to get there.”

We hope that community meetings to begin gathering feedback start soon. While the feedback we have heard has been negative to date, that’s not surprising. People aren’t typically rushing to speak in favor of an idea they like (they just assume it will happen). So, many people could be in favor of this idea. However, it will be up to both sides to make sure their opinions are heard in the coming months.

Later Start Times at Park City Schools

There has been a citizen driven movement in our community, somewhat started by Dr John Hanrahan and vocalized by Sally Elliot to at least have a discussion about starting school later. This morning, I heard that “0 hour” at the high school began at 6:15 AM. YES, school starts at SIX FIFTEEN AM (for some kids).  That appears to be the time slot where many of our advanced courses like AP Physics lab are offered.  There’s nothing quite like waking up to a discussion of advanced physics!

That said, the school district seems open to discussing the option of starting high school later.

If you missed last night’s school district presentation on later start times for our high schoolers, as we did, you may be interested in reading the powerpoint and/or watching a video of the event.

Click here for the presentation.. The video is below.

Office Hours with Ember Conley (3/25/2016)

Each week, Park City School District’s Office Hours with Ember Conley attracts more citizens. This morning 15 1/2 people attended the meeting. That 1/2 was a baby (get them started young!).

Today’s discussion stretched from later start times, to the status of teacher surveys, to the learning center, to the plan for both a 5/6 and 7/8 school, to growth, to some miscellaneous items. Below was my best effort at capturing major ideas expressed at the meeting.

  • The first topic was later start times for our classes…
    • Late start meeting last night was great.
    • Citizen said she has had kids and always dreaded early start.She says “we have a community that is so well educated and we have so many AP classes and are trying to compete and kids are taking heavy loads and classes like Physics lab is at 0 hour. The bus picks them up at 6:47 AM.” One of her kids will have zero hour runs track, and does debate. She realizes there is time that has to be made up but she feels our kids need more rest.
    • Citizen asks what zero hour is. Dr COnley replied it’s an optional hour of class before school. It starts at 6:15AM.
    • Citizen asks why classes have to be picked in March. The answer was that scheduling is complex with regard to when classes can be offered, what teacher needs are, etc.
    • Citizen says he understands that part of the scheduling problem is the buses.
    • Citizen says it is hard to work with late start times with younger children.
    • Dr Conley says if swapped times, Ecker Hill would be the earliest start time and that would be only two years.
    • Citizens asks when the elementary school would start. Response was that everything is still be considered but the current proposed scenario is at 8:15.
    • Two bell system (two start times for district) would cost extra $1 million in capital for buses.
    • Three bell system (three different start times) would have high school starting at 9AM. They would finish at 4PM.
    • Dr Conley says if that some administrators are concerned that if we are buying buses before we put money into facilities, something is wrong.
    • Citizen says 88 minute class periods seem too long. Dr Conley says 7 period day is more efficient than block period but that we’ve had great success with the block schedule (block schedule means certain classes on one day and othe classes on alternating days)
    • Dr Conley says she would personally prefer shorter days with more school days but that can cost a lot of money and has other drawbacks.
    • Citizen says she got a call before the meeting last night. She referenced a teacher who says he has kids who fall asleep first period. He says that’s not the case with later classes. She says many teachers have expressed this.
    • Dr Conley says one of the ripple effects with moving some schools to an earlier start time (and high school later) is after school programs. She says if classes start earlier, then young kids will be at after school programs for longer periods, so after school programs may have to cost citizens more.
  • A citizen asks if results of the teacher survey about the district been released?
    • Citizen says she has heard that teachers are afraid of speaking out. She feels they need to be able to speak out.
    • Dr Conley says she wants to hear what teachers think. She meets with teacher and the union regularly.
    • Phil Kaplan (of the school board) is facilitating this process. Dr Conley says there were so many comments that need to be coded to responses. Statisticians have been brought in to look at it. It should be released by April or May.
    • Citizen says there seems to be a culture of where teachers are afraid.
  • Citizen asks what the status of the learning center is. He says there are rumors flying about it being closed.
    • Dr Conley says they are actually adding positions at learning center.
    • Citizens asks if there are exit studies about how the kids are doing after leaving the learning center. Dr Conley says she will check into it but it is a hard problem to track.
    • Citizen says that perhaps the problem is that the district is talking about bringing the learning center into high school and people are getting confused.
    • Dr Conley says that there are more and more problems with TMJH. So, they are continuing to look at bringing the 9th grade into the high school. As part of that, it may make sense to bring the learning center into the high school as well because more technical classes could be offered to both learning center kids and other kids at the school.
  • Citizen asks why there is continuing talk about having two schools at intermediate level (5/6 and 7/8). He says trend is that K-8 now. He says you don’t find the 5/6 and 7/8 many places. He asks why are we trying to do that?
    • Citizen responded to the question and said having 9th grade at the high school makes sense. Many 9th graders need access to 10th grade classes. So, he believes a 9th grade close to the high school. He says then it becomes a building issue.
    • Another citizen says we should be looking at what is right for the kids before discussing building and traffic.
    • Citizen says most people are fine with the 9th grade being in the high school.
    • Dr Conley says she asked her elementary teachers about what grades should be together. She said some said it should be K-6. However, most said they should have 5th and 6th together. Many of the teachers felt that 6th graders should not be with 7th graders because of the different maturity levels. Teachers also felt that 5th and 6th should be out of the current schools with the addition of Pre-K.
  • Citizen asks what will happen with growth.
    • Dr Conley says an example is Trailside. She says we need three more teachers for additional classes but there are not enough classrooms.
    • Dr Conley says the biggest growth right now is 8th, 9th, and 10th graders.
    • Dr Conley says she has been talking with North Summit and South Summit. She says she has told them that until they give us money for schools, we will not open our classrooms. She said that did not go over well with them but she was saying what was right for our district.
    • Citizen says she has shifted her thinking because she thinks there will be many additional Kindergartners and Pre K full day, she thinks the district will be out of room in the elementary school. She suggests that an early learning center be added. She says that there could be 300-400 PreK and Kindergarten kids in this type of building and it could be built for 3 to 4 year olds. Dr Conley says those are the types of things that we are open to. Dr Conley says she HAS to do something with TMJH. She said she then has to get the 9th graders into the high school. She says the rest of it, she is open to discussing.
  • Citizen asks if Dr Conley is at liberty to share what bad things she just learned about TMJH. Dr Conley said no.
  • Citizen says one of the other things to think about there are opportunities when older kids mix with younger kids. She went to a K-8 and said the opportunities the younger kids had because of the older kids were huge. She said the little kids were separated from older kids in the building a bit but it worked.
  • Look at hiring dance teacher full time at Parley’s Park. She has been teaching part time reading through dance.
  • Dr Conley wants to add 10-14 additional teachers (1.5 to TMJH. 3 sections Kindergarten. Rest are elementary). Right now our lowest class size is 11. The largest average is 23.3.

Note: I also recorded today’s Office Hour’s meeting. If you are bored on a Friday night, and interested you may want to give it a listen. This meeting is at a loud coffee shop, so you may hear some strange noises from time to time. Click play below to begin listening.

[yendifplayer audio=1]

 

Summit County Buys the Option to Build on the Land Next to Jeremy Ranch Elementary

Yesterday, Summit County Manager Tom Fisher signed a purchase order for an option to buy 30 acres of land next to Jeremy Ranch Elementary School (the land between the school and the Burt Brothers). The intent is to implement solutions related to traffic and affordable housing, if further study ultimately determines this land would be useful for those purposes.

The purchase price of the land, should the county decide to buy it, is $3.7 million or $125,000 per acre.

Our best guess for intended uses would be an intercept lot for parking and some sort of workforce housing. We are working to get more information so we can get a better idea of what the county has in mind.

We’ll provide additional information as it becomes available.

Press-release-dahle

Click here for the press release

New School District Monitoring System Being Put in Place To Protect Our Students

As many people remember, in January an Ecker Hill teacher was charged with felony counts for “alleged inappropriate communications with a student that spanned approximately four months.” According to the Park Record, “The allegations against [the teacher] first came to light earlier this month when the accuser, a student at Ecker Hill, showed a school counselor a series of sexually explicit emails [the teacher] had allegedly sent him.” At the time there was a justified outcry from the community over how something like this could happen and go unnoticed for so long. In the next few days a new system will come online to help prevent something like what allegedly happened from happening again at Park City schools.

The school district has subscribed to a service called Gaggle. While the name doesn’t sound serious, their business is. Gaggle provides a monitoring solution that scans email, attachments, calendars, and documents looking for pornography, inappropriate images, and certain words. According to the School District’s press release, “Once an item is flagged, Gaggle Student Safety Representatives review content and apply district-approved intervention procedures.” Perhaps most importantly, this solutions watches over both students and staff for signs of mis conduct.

According to Associate Superintendent of Human Resources, Dr. Tim McConnell, “Contracting with Gaggle Safety Management will expand the district’s current capabilities to monitor and filter content. Gaggle will not only alert us to inappropriate content, it will also allow us to be stay on top of issues like bullying, threats of violence and self-harm. I want to give credit to our Technology Director, Joe Stout, for finding this service and working out the details to have it implemented.“

It’s also important to note that Gaggle appears to be good at what they do. They have been in the K-12 education market for 17 years. They are a 14 time award finalist for the Software & Information Industry Association (SIIA) CODiE award. They also have a very well defined student/staff privacy policy.

In addition to looking at new email coming in, we wanted to understand if Gaggle will be used to look at older emails to find cases where inappropriate conduct may have taken place in the past. Dr McConnell responded that “Gaggle won’t go retroactively, but we do have an email archiver. As a part of stepping up our efforts, we did look for inappropriate content based on sexually oriented verbiage – which would have included attachments. Every email in and out has been archived for approximately 8 years – over 33 million emails – and they will continue to be archived.”

We at the Park Rag are glad that personnel within the school district have already thought of how to handle historical email and have taken steps to understand whether any issues took place. It demonstrates that the school district took the matter very seriously. It will be interesting to see if any additional charges are pressed.

While no software product can guarantee that our children will not become victims of sexual predators, systems like Gaggle can both prevent predators from taking action due to the likelihood they will be caught and catch those despicable persons that try to do harm our children.

 

Summit County Council Candidate Colin DeFord’s Use of Social Media is Encouraging

For years, information in Summit County has been disseminated through the Park Record and KPCW. Both do a great job but they have their limitations. Both only have a limited staff, both are mainly one way communication mechanisms, the Park Record has only so much space to print upon, and KPCW local news has less than an hour a day to talk to guests.

The impact of this is that people may miss important stories and events. People also haven’t been provided with a way for two-way conversation about topics of interest. Yes, you could call your school board representative but the conversation you had ended with you and the board member. Any knowledge gained, typically wasn’t shared with the community at large.

Enter social media.

First, please don’t roll your eyes and stop reading. All social media means is, “websites and applications that enable users to create and share content or to participate in social networking.” It means both providing and getting information from non-traditional sources and/or in non-traditional ways. In our community it means Facebook posts, tweets on Twitter, and messages on Next Door.

A great example of this during the past election season was about the Park City School bond. Messages were posted by citizens on NextDoor for and against the school bond. In some cases, school board representatives chimed in with their views. It was a free-for-all discussion, in all its imperfection, yet ideas were disseminated — and typically with civility. Unfortunately, when the bond died, so did a lot of the discussion.

Then recently I noticed that current Snyderville Basin Planning Commissioner and candidate for the Summit County Council, Colin DeFord, was posting on Next Door and Twitter. His most recent post is about the new proposed Skull Candy building at the Boyer Tech Park. Mr DeFord wanted to inform the community about an upcoming meeting regarding the new Skull Candy building. Then a neighbor replied that they may not get great turnout at the meeting because it was caucus night. Mr DeFord replied to the neighbor with an update on what happened at the meeting and when the next discussion will be. Frankly it was perfect. Within a few hours of the meeting ending, citizens knew what had happened and what the next steps were. Sure, we could have listened to KPCW this morning and probably received an overview, but because Mr DeFord chose to use social media, we got it straight from someone who understands the issue in great depth and within a few hours of the meeting’s conclusion.

I reached out to Mr DeFord and asked how he felt social media could benefit the citizens of Summit County. He replied:

“My goal is to help to inform our community on the public processes in government, and to do that in such a way that people will have access to the information. Currently, the state requirement for ‘noticing’ citizens about public hearings is via the county and state noticing website, with an ad that is placed in The Park Record. It’s been my experience that those ads go largely unnoticed. I have come to understand, during my time on the Planning Commission, that most people in our community find out about these projects only when the dirt movers show up, and at that point, it is far too late for public comment. Ideally, the active use of social media will further bring together our community, as more and more of our neighbors find a way to be included in the process of local government. Social media is far-reaching and it’s instant, and it can be tailored to give each individual what they are searching for, quickly, and at their fingertips.” 

Mr DeFord’s final sentence says it perfectly… social media is instant, it’s tailored, and it gets people the information they are interested in. Yet, I still don’t think most elected officials understand the power of the medium. In the wake of the bond defeat, some school board members were saying things like, “we can’t be responsible for watching what happens on social media and responding!” Perhaps instead elected officials should be creating the message on social media and then listening to the responses. It’s as if some people don’t understand how many people are encompassed by social media. In Jeremy Ranch, alone, over 800 people are on NextDoor. That represents about 45% of the households in Jeremy Ranch. If you want to reach Jeremy Ranch people, is there a better way?

And it’s not just Jeremy Ranch. What percentage of people around Park City use Facebook? Nationwide, 71% of adults use Facebook. It’s likely as high or higher here. I’ve heard that if you want to know where the traffic problems are, you check the Park City Garage Sale Facebook account. Really.

While I’m sure it is more work for our elected leaders to not only attend meetings but to post updates on social media, and answer responses, isn’t that what we should expect? Perhaps it’s an age thing. Perhaps Mr DeFord represents a younger generation who believes in constant, open communication. If so, I celebrate that. It makes me wonder what other ideas the younger generation may have regarding our critical issues like traffic.

The beauty of this is that it’s not only Mr DeFord who can take this first step. It’s open to any candidate or person in government. It just takes a willingness to do so. Perhaps one’s civic duty is no longer just serving one’s community but also openly communicating about what is happening.

We hope that Mr DeFord will continue to use social media in the run up to the election, and if elected, throughout his tenure on the Summit County Council. We asked him about that and he said:

I have a Twitter account (@colind) that I use to send out notices, in addition to the Nextdoor website, which I have come to find has been a good place for posting neighborhood communications, although the reach of it is limited, at least for right now, to only a few neighborhoods. I will continue to do my best to help to adapt the services that our community uses the most, to assist in getting the word out. Access to the goings-on in our community should be freely available for all, and social media has shown to be a wonderful way to share information.”

I couldn’t say it better myself.

I really hope two things happen out of this election cycle. I hope our elected officials learn to embrace and use social media, even though it is more effort. I hope that if they do, our citizens take full advantage of that and we find a good mix of communication that provides constant feedback and ultimately better outcomes for our community.

Do We Need a Better Way of Notifying Citizens of Potential Development Changes?

Recently on social media, people began asking what the new development by Ruby Tuesdays was. Many people seemed shocked that a Whole Foods was being put there and the lament began over all the issues that were discussed months ago when the development was being approved.

During the approval process, the topic was covered extensively on KPCW and in the Park Record. The county publicized the planning meetings as required by law. Everything happened as it technically should have. Yet, it appears this is the first time some people had heard of this. I would like to say I’m shocked that people didn’t know, but I’m not. People around Park City are busy and often don’t pay attention until the ground moves. This is unfortunate because then it is too late.

So, what could be done? We need to find a way to notify citizens of changes that may be happening, even if they don’t read public notices in the Park Record, listen to KPCW, or live within a 1,000 feet of a proposed development (where a notice is mailed). In the Whole Foods example, we missed an opportunity for input and education with all the parents driving their kids to Ecker Hill, people visiting the outlet mall, and citizens using the trails near Landmark Drive. If there was only a way for all these people to be notified that a change is potentially coming.

Thankfully, there is and we don’t need to reinvent the wheel. This is what is posted in Toronto when a development change may occur:

toronto-sign

Imagine if a similar sign to this, that was readable from a car (maybe 8-10 feet wide or larger), was posted on the new Whole Foods lot when this discussion was taking place months ago. It has all the information a person would need to understand that something was happening:

  • It tells them there is a potential change coming
  • It tells them what the change is in simple terms
  • It tells them where and when the meeting is
  • It tell them who to contact
  • There is a QR code that makes it easy to be directed to a website about the issue
  • It asks for community feedback
  • It shows a picture of the change
  • It uses icons to make it quick and easy to understand

I believe Park City Municipal does post a small sign indicating a potential change may be coming and perhaps the county does for the Snyderville Basin, too. However, I’ve never seen any sign as clear as this and of a significant size to garner the public’s attention.

A sign like this would not guarantee that everyone would know about potential changes to land use but it has a much better shot at informing the public than what seems to be happening today. It may not be exactly what we need, and I’m sure our current planners would have some better ideas on how to make it work, but I think something like it would be a great start.

The good news is that Summit County is currently working on updating the development code for the Snyderville Basin. It’s the perfect time to talk about the idea and see if it has legs. If it does, and signage requirements could be added to the development code, we’d be on our way to better educating and informing the public. Hopefully that would lead to greater public engagement and sharing of opinions, before the ground is moved, and when those opinions can actually impact action.

Updated: Tania Knauer Has Decided Not to Run for Park City School Board

Current School Board President, Tania Knauer, has decided not to run for reelection this November. Originally she had filed for Park City District 3. Four candidates remain vying for that seat:

  • Art Brothers
  • Moe Hickey
  • Kevin Kennedy
  • Petra Butler

Ms Knauer provided this comment about her decision:

I’ve been a volunteer in the district for 15 years, my youngest graduates this June and I’ve always said I’d graduate along with her. I’m ready to do some traveling and get involved in non-profits I’m passionate about.

In the last couple of years the board has:

  • negotiated the licensed, classified and administrative contracts in a few months (compared to 18 months last time)
  • had no additional tax increases and created a sustainable budget vs. two tax increases and expenses higher than revenue in the previous few years
  • improved governance and transparency by cleaning up the policy committee, creating a board handbook to guide board operations and getting video meetings and other info online
  • created a master plan and will come up with Plan B on implementation this year
  • gone on a listening tour after the bond, improving community engagement thru different initiatives and hiring a communications specialist to help improve outreach.

There is still a ton of work to do, but we have a strong, knowledgeable board. We also have a full slate of candidates which offers choices for voters. It’s great to see new blood getting involved.

 

The New Whole Foods Will Be a Good Litmus Test

There’s buzz brewing on social media about the new Whole Foods on Landmark Drive, across from the Ruby Tuesdays. People started by asking “what’s that new development I see from I-80?” and it has become the common argument, “the traffic is going to be terrible on the frontage road once they build that Whole Foods.” While I often defend social media, this issue was decided months ago, and complaining now doesn’t do a lot of good now. The opportunity for the public to comment has passed, but please don’t take me wrong, I always feel horrible when someone first learns of an issue when the construction trucks arrive. I feel like I’ve failed, as should KPCW and the Park Record.

Yet, that doesn’t change the fact that a bigger and better Whole Foods is coming to Park City — but with more impact to traffic on Landmark Drive. The positive is that your experience shopping at Whole Foods will be much better. The potential negative is that driving there could be much worse.

When this came before the Snyderville Basin Planning Commission, they vetted the idea fully. There were hours of discussion about traffic, and left turns versus right turns, and access roads, and well pretty much everything.

Yet, did they get it right? The Planning Commission didn’t have to give them the right to change the development plans from what was decided years before (i.e. small retail) to one that supported the new Whole Foods. If the Planning Commission had denied the changes it is more than likely the land would still be sitting vacant. There would definitely be less traffic on the road for the foreseeable future.

Sometimes I wonder if the forest is lost for the trees. A million i’s and t’s are crossed and eventually a development is approved; however, when looking at the big picture, many people would say that this specific location does not serve the community good. Traffic on Landmark Drive will surely be negatively impacted. People going to Ecker Hill School will likely be impacted. Does it also negatively impact tax revenues from the outlet mall and Walmart?

This is likely the most significant change, impacting the average joe, in the Snyderville Basin, since the Village at Kimball was completed a few years ago. While we will have to wait a few years for completion, it will likely provide a good litmus test to understand whether the powers that be are making good planning decisions.

I personally hope that we both get a fabulous, new Whole Foods and that any traffic issues are a non-issue… but I have a hard time seeing how both happen.

Update: Thanks to the citizen who pointed out I have confused Red Robin for Ruby Tuesdays. That has been updated.